Suggestion I will make a Free EA with your Indicator

this just one day test, give me more time

 

Sorry I have no idea about demarker...

 

This is what happens with this set file on EU alone- M30 ( I'm sure XAUUSD is definitly the same):

Ronaldo may have profits for 15 days or a month or two, but if he will keep using this set file his account is in great danger!

 

Hello Mr. Tanaka, in my previous post I meant if you could add the same parameters to Trio Orchestra, like this:

Stoploss (it could be useful as well)
Use Solo Piano: true/false
Use Solo Violin: true/false
Use Solo Cello: true/false

..plus, the things you previously added in the last version:

custom comments
news filter
basket profit

Thanks a lot in advance for you time, I really appreciate your efforts!

P.S: I also asked why, in your opinion, the MaxLots parameter doesn't work..it's strange but true, I verified it in real and demo accounts..

 

OK, I added ON/OFF for 3 strategies.

 

Oh, it looks like max lot is not coding inside..... That is why...
Do you want me to code it?
What does max lot mean?
If total oders lot size is more than XX lOTS, then stop EA??
Or if orders reach to xxx lot size, then stop orders??

 

Give me some time, there are so many requests even in private . I don't have enough time,
Please don't send me private requests. I will code EA in this thread first!

 

Thanks, I will check...

 

The second: if orders reach to XXX lot size, then stop orders..but not every order, just the ones that require a lot that is above the XXX value..do you think that would be possible to code it that way?

 

please share ea and set file

 

..it seems also that the new EA doens't open any positions now

 

What about this? if you set max lot size =0.9LOT (for example)
BUY 0.1LOT
SELL 0.2LOT
BUY 0.1LOT
SELL 0.5LOT
----------------------
Total 0.9LOT
If your total order lot size is 0.9LOTs, stop new orders, so you can minimize lot size increase and risk.
Backtest is working, right?

For me it is working fine.

 

Hi Tanaka,
I have tested 50K starting balance Trio EA (EU pair) with start lot 0.01 and it didn't survive . The EA is good to some point but the main problem I see is that all 3 engines are trading on the same time frame. It might be much better if each engine TF could have different inputs...for example one would be traded on M15, the other on H1 and the third on H4. Because all 3 indys EA is using give too similar values on the same TF, but they would start trading at very different points in time if CCI would give M15 value, Stoch H1 value and RSI H4 value. Maybe worth thinking about it....

Green pips to you and thank you for your excellent work

 

Sorry mr tanaka akiko i i just want to upgrade th EA that you already made i didnt mean to send private requests

 

I don't know why, but backtest of this EA doesn't work on my usual MT4
I just tested it in another MT4 and it works fine, I guess the other MT4 was too old


About your idea for the MaxLots parameter: sounds GREAT to me

About the post of Rocky16..it seems that this Trio Orchestra version is exactly the same as the famous AF Global, which I don't have the mql4 file..
Trio Orchestra is better than Ilan TrioKS in backtest, which is not identical to AF Global..
I'm testing Trio Orchestra on a real account, and I'm quite sure that with the correct initial lot, the right max amount of positions and the max number of lots it will survive almost any market condition on EURUSD..that's why I'm asking you these adjustments

 

I tested 50K with 0.01 starting lot! The profits per year were 10K and in second year DD was 50K. Sure it can survive with 100K maybe but profits would be 10% per year and DD still 5 times bigger. Good profitable consistent EA should have more average yearly gain then max DD in 10 years. Maybe you do not understand that but think about it. If you use 50% equity stop on 100K account it will take you 5 years to recover from that loss!!!! If you use 5% equity stop it can be hit more then once per year if it is bad year and the result is also bad. I'm sure you do understand that not all EAs that can survive are good . If they don't bring profits they are not good. ( the numbers above were examples but the max DD and profits per year ratio is real and bad on this EA)

 

If you tested it with the base pipstep value, your backtest is useless..try to triplicate that value, in AF Global it's set on 180 instead of 50.....9/10 max positions per strategy..you'll see the difference Also..backtest is a thing, forward test on a real account is another one

 

Bro, I used 20 pips (200 points step) . Say you for example limit trades to 5. The only thing you do with this is limit blowup, but the loss can still grow and it takes forever to get out. The EA as is is not good, even if Tanaka manages max lot it will help locking in part of DD but if trend persists you cannot get out of the trade ever and you will have to take a loss that will take a long time to recover.

But, test it yourself with quick candles test 2014 until today and you will definitly stop trading it on real account.

 

5 trades is definitely not enough for this kind of EA..anyway, there's no need to discuss about this..let's Tanaka finish his job..thank you for the advice anyway, for me every opinion is always welcome!

P.S.: anyway, if you have some safe and sustainable strategy to share, I'm all ears!

 

EA win rate 90% looks promissing, but too early to say, needs much more long term testing..maybe even some new adjustments. I posted 2.5 years tick test result and set yesterday..you can play with it and see if you can improve it.