New EA ATA_EA (Beta Version)

This is my review for this thread:
i am running this ea from yesterday. so far so good.
Thank you for sharing.

 

This is my review for this thread:
Excellent EA. Thanks a lot pannik.

 

Thank you all for your confidence.

 

My revision for this thread. Excellent ea!!

 

Hi pannik,

Thank you very much, for sharing this excellent EA.

for me, I only have one day in demo, I think it's the best EA I've ever tried, and I can tell you that I've tried hundreds.

It's still in BETA: even when you think, that it stopped being BETA?

Thank you

 

This is my review for this thread:
The best

 

Hello,

Thank You,

I think need more time and more test.
I am working about in a multicurrency version. It can to run up 56 groups from 1 chart.
I want to improve it.

 

This is my review for this thread:
Excellent EA. Thanks a lot pannik

 

excellent, I also have that version in Demo. download it from the links of your signature here in the forum. I have it in. a cent. I'll tell you how the tests are progressing.

successes

 

Hi mate, do you using the CURRENCY TO USE FOR PAIRS with the same SUITE OF ORDERS?
set 3 : eur usd chf 3 & b_s_s s_b_b _3
set 4 : gbp usd chf 4 & b_b_s S_b_b _4

or you just modify all this combination?

 

Hi pannik, does the 1.13 is the full feature version? i see that we can change lot size (where that is the limitation of all previous version , limited by starting lot)

if you are set ea work in 56 pairs, so we need to find the broker tha allowed more than 200 order?

 

Hello,
It's CoupleHedgeEA that use, not ATA_EA.
Best Regards.

 

Hello,
yes, 1.3 is the full and last version of ATA_EA.
Version 2.0 use same operation and option, but is multicurrency.
I make for easier testings.
I use for testing a broker with unlimited opened orders.
Best Regards.

 

How many pair that used to using this ea and also how much capital needed to running ea for safe trading
if good for micro account it will good we can try to use on cent account

 

Hello,
Multicurrency version is only for tests to find better groups.
I start a test yestarday with 100000 balance, bigger step (200) and... the maximum opened orders until now is 609.
Best Regards.

 

Hello,
I have disigned expert to working like triangular arbitrage but make a grid of asymetric orders.
So, I think best suite is #1, this is correct suite from original idea (triangular arbitrage).
I 'm thinking suite #1 have less DD from other suites in long term.
With other suites if one pair moved faster, there is no way to control DD.
Best regards.

 

Nice Expert
Thank You all
But Please What the best group and best sitting

 

The bigest question in the world!!!
To answer need tons of tests.

 

Hello Pannik. By the correct technical point of view, you are right the Suite #1 was supposed to be the most efficient.
However, in the comparative tests that I have performed until now, the Suites #3 and #4 are leading the ranking of profitability.

I totally agree with you that these Suites are more sensitive to the market conditions, specially during high volatility days, when we have to adjust the parameters of the EA to avoid a situation in which the account reaches an irreversible DD, or a number of opened orders that achieves to the maximium acccepted by the account (specially when the account has the max limit of 200, an usual trading condition in many brokers).

As I am still in a stage of using only the Statical Type Progress Step, along this week, sometimes I was almost "driving" the EA during the European Session, adjusting the parameters in order to control the exposure. It had been a nice experience which is allowing me to understand the EA and gradually discover its limits.

Regards,