New EA CoreX G V1.6 MT4

My bad , yes results are same . In fixed

 

You can set up and conduct tests in this manner.

 

Corex is profitable. But we need to know ADP 2 OR 3. which is safe also need to make steady profits

All the settings are tuned for gold.

 

Most people will use ADP3.

 

Automatic-Lotsize must be false

 

NO ,I use true.you can test it

 

ADP1:

- Can have multiple trades at the same time

- Has the highest SL and highest TP

- Most risky, but also makes the most profit (also the biggest loss of the 3 when the stop loss is reached)

ADP2:

- Can only have 1 trade at a time

- Has lower SL than ADP1 but also the lowest TP

- Is not quite as risky to lose as ADP1

ADP3:

- Can have multiple trades at the same time

- Has the lowest SL and “middle” TP, which is adaptive

- The risk of loss here is lower than with ADP1, but can be higher than with ADP2 if several trades are open

 

Since I want to test whether risk level affects trading, automatic-lotsize needs to be false.
I believe that risk level only affects lot size.

 

I understand what you mean, but after the risk test, in live trading, I believe this parameter still needs to be set to true in order to most effectively utilize the margin for profitable trades. Is that correct?

 

I just want to find out if risk level affects trading.

 

I understand what you mean. When I first tested this EA, I also tested it in the way you suggested. It's a good idea.

 

As you said risk level affect only lots used in trades. It doesn't affect the trade count or opening.

 

I use adp4

 

The real account of the inventor of the EA, which is published on the MQL website, also started trading at the same time, synchronized with my testing.

 

What you can also do is assign a separate copy of the EA for each strategy (ADP1, ADP2, ADP3, etc.), attaching them to different charts. Just make sure to assign a unique magic number for each copy of the EA to avoid conflicts in trade management

 

同様に

 

This is my review for this thread:
very good

 

In my pov ,APD 2 is safer and making steady profits. APD3 need to have higher win rate closer to 90% to match the loss, i can see pattern after 5 or above trade apd 3 is failing.

Big lot size with small risk Is better...

 

I created this for myself, so it's in Japanese, but it's a backtest result for a non-optimized period.
I stopped the EA because it was over-optimized.

 

Are you saying EA is scam ?