New EA CoreX G V1.6 MT4

tp reached on todays opened order...

 

This is my review for this thread:
Good to now

 

Today, the EA opened two orders, and both were completed with profits!

 

Since December 31st, a total of four orders have been opened, all of which have been completed with profits.

 

Cynera and ai gen would better option for users who like to use AI . But both of them are not making profits .

Cynera and ai gen live result is not matching with back test even we can say ai won't work back test. But also with signal uploaded by the devlopers is mismatching.

Technically cynera is dead no tradeing activity for last 20 days.

Any ea worth for consideration?

 

CyNera is down for the holidays.

 

Please bro, share your settings thanks .. please kindly share your settings here

 

Understood.
Cynera or cyneron . Which would be best .
Cynera I have tried without ai because ,based on comments it's look like AI is just gimmick it seems, it work well without that.but still back testing for December month seem loss i have thought this EA might be optimised for the other months which is all in profit.
Cyneron need test it .

An suggestions you got from your testing for reference

 

Adp1 sell @2647.151

 

Hello friends
A few important points about the settings of this robot
- Strategy 3 is the most profitable

- According to experience, if the trailing start option is 47, the probability of SL will be very low:
Trailing start 47
Trailing step 13

- The Exchange Rate option is the most important and effective, the higher the number, the more profit but also the higher the risk
I have used the number 1.7

 

Thank you! let`s try it !

 

90% of the currently popular MQL5 EAs are over-optimized.
If you can get results even when backtesting on a non-optimized period, then the EA is the real deal.
However, I only know of 2 or 3 profitable EAs available on this forum.
I believe the creators of CyNera and AI GEN XII are the same person, so I think it will break down at some point.

 

CyNera and AI GEN XII have the same strategy for opening orders, but Core X is different from them.

 

A non-optimized backtest period shows the truth.

 

The Holy Grail does not exist!

 

Thanks for the information. However, in live signals, APD3 is not performing well. I believe the developer is not using a trailing stop-loss, which is resulting in significant losses. I agree that using a trailing stop-loss could help lock in some profits, but the drawdowns in APD3 are more frequent and larger compared to APD2.

In APD2, we can adjust the stop-loss closer to APD3's levels. Has anyone tested this over a long period and identified a stop-loss value that works consistently? Since the take-profit in APD2 is smaller, it often hits the target quickly without much trouble."

 

But we won't stop looking for them

 

same to you!

 

I havent any order on Adp 1 2 3
And not on today's back tests ..

 

Do you have those results for cynera , could you please share , we can come to conclusion.